This sentence is also interesting:
Interestingly, countries with top personal income tax rates that are higher than in the U.S., such as Germany, France, or Sweden, have ratios that are closer to 1 to 1. Meaning, the share of the tax burden paid by the richest decile in those countries is roughly equal to their share of the nation's income.
I know this can be shown in the U.S. over time as well - when top marginal tax rates were lower, the highest earning 10% earned a smaller share of overall income. So keep in mind that there seems to be a reverse correlation between the actual average tax rates the rich pay and their share of the overall burden. In other words, they are not actually hurting to pay this large a percentage of overall taxes even if sometimes these comparisons are meant to show how unfair our system is.
h/t Greg Mankiw
----------------
Update:
Matt Yglesias points out that it also doesn't include US regressive taxes - State and Local (he's wrong that it does not include payroll though). And he fails to mention it does not include VAT.
and Karl Smith comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment